[Vv] Should we allow clitk filters for any vector type?

[Rômulo Pinho]

Thanks, Joel! It's indeed a valid suggestion, which we'll consider. 
Still, I decided to rethink the problem a bit and I eventually came up 
with a different solution, which can later be combined with yours. In 
the end, I "rolled back" to support only the default vector image types 
and left the other ones commented. I just had to do some refactoring to 
make scalar and vector types independent, which wasn't the case before. 
I believe the code is cleaner now.

A new version has thus been pushed.
Cheers,
Rômulo


On 05/24/2012 06:58 PM, Joël Schaerer wrote:
> Why don't you add a CMake option and disable by default the ones that 
> are less likely to be used? You can always compile everything when you 
> make a release.
>
> joel
>
> On 05/24/2012 05:02 PM, Simon Rit wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Romulo has just pushed a change to allow the compilation of many more
>> vector filters, see
>> http://git.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/pubgit/?p=clitk.git;a=commitdiff;h=0fe907bc305f611ba8bc2ab95e287658efaefede 
>>
>> This has quite an impact on compilation time. The compilation of
>> clitkImageToImageGenericFilterBase.cxx.o takes now 3'40 instead of
>> 1'40 on my computer. I can live with this but does someone else have
>> something against this change?
>> Simon
>> _______________________________________________
>> vv mailing list
>> vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
>> http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/vv
>
> _______________________________________________
> vv mailing list
> vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
> http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/vv
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/pipermail/vv/attachments/20120525/3dabcb59/attachment.html>