[Vv] FW: Patches for compatibily with old versions of Qt and gcc

Simon Rit simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
Sun Sep 18 00:10:31 CEST 2011


Hi Joel,
Yes, it does make a difference and the patch about
vv/vvStructureSetActor* should be undone (I'm not in a position to do
it this week, Romulo can you do it please?). The difference? With your
patch, the tool "Display ROI", David's jewelry, has disappeared. Your
confusion comes probably from the fact that one header file is now
generated by cmake in your binary directory: vv/vvToolsList.h
Detected H-20 hours before vv demo at MICCAI :-).
Simon

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:09 AM, PINHO Romulo <PINHO at lyon.fnclcc.fr> wrote:
> Ok, Joël, thanks!
>
> I applied the new patch as well.
> It will be in the public repository soon.
>
> Kind regards,
> Rômulo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Schaerer [mailto:joel.schaerer at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tue 9/13/2011 15:40
> To: PINHO Romulo; vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
> Subject: Re: FW: [Vv] Patches for compatibily with old versions of Qt and
> gcc
>
> Hi Rômulo,
>
> I actually meant vv/vvStructureSetActor.{cxx,h}. (see my attached patch
> to see exactly what I mean)
>
> joel
>
> PINHO Romulo wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Joël!
>>
>> Patches applied, committed, and pushed.
>>
>> However, we could not find the file you mentioned, vvStructureSet.cxx,
>> in the sources... Could you please give us more details?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Rômulo
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: vv-bounces at creatis.insa-lyon.fr on behalf of Joel Schaerer
>> Sent: Thu 9/8/2011 17:11
>> To: vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
>> Subject: [Vv] Patches for compatibily with old versions of Qt and gcc
>>
>> Hi vv guys,
>>
>> I've compiled the latest version of vv on my rather old distribution. I
>> had to make quite a few changes to get it to compile. Some changes are
>> uninteresting and intrusive, but I think a few changes could be merged
>> and could actually improve the code. I join the patches to this mail.
>>
>> Also, is it normal that vvStructureSet.cxx is compiled and wrap when the
>> corresponding tool is not used? I tried commenting the files in the
>> CMakeLists, and it worked fine.
>>
>> joel
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vv mailing list
> vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
> http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/vv
>
>



More information about the vv mailing list