[Vv] Window Level Fusion Slider
Rajamani, Kumar (GE Global Research)
Kumar.Rajamani at ge.com
Mon Sep 13 12:39:46 CEST 2010
Dear Simon
Thanks for the update regarding the window/level functionality
I will do a update and then check its functionality.
There could also be potential issues if the W/L ranges of the base image
And the W/L of the overlay image are very disparate
This might require some grey level mapping before the overlays are done
I would like to know your thoughts regarding this
I shall test it with this version and let you know my results
Warm Regards
Kumar
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Functionality of the fusion opacity slider (Simon Rit)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:12:42 +0200
From:
To: David.Sarrut at creatis.insa-lyon.fr, vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
Cc: "Shirhatti, Shruti \(GE Global Research, non-GE\)"
<Shruti.Shirhatti at ge.com>, "Rajamani, Kumar \(GE Global
Research\)"
<Kumar.Rajamani at ge.com>
Subject: Re: [Vv] Functionality of the fusion opacity slider
Message-ID:
<AANLkTikSLvHeRRGDJDODmEMeysLmtozjLv-MsWn_ya1=@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello,
I noticed that the window/level of the fusion was not accounted for. I
have tried to correct on the cvs version. Let me know if you have time
to test it !
Simon
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, David Sarrut
<David.Sarrut at creatis.insa-lyon.fr> wrote:
> Hello Shruti,
> you are right, the fusion tool is?buggy. If I remember well, it
> (almost) works when the fusion image as pixel value in [0:1000]. We
> must rethink this tools that was initially intended to display dose
> distribution on a CT image and not really to fuse two images in a very
> general way. Could you please indicate us for what kind of usage you
want to use this tool ?
> Sincerely,
> David
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:20, Shirhatti, Shruti (GE Global Research,
> non-GE) <Shruti.Shirhatti at ge.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> As per my understanding, the opacity slider functions as following
>> When a fusion image?is added and the slider?is at the left extreme,
>> opacity is 0, ie the base image is completely visible, right extreme
>> implies the fusion image is completely visible and in between is a
combination.
>> eg: halfway through the slider?means both base and fusion images are
>> equally visible Is my understanding correct?
>> Im still a little confused as to what the opacity slider is doing?
>> I tried several datasets but it varies from image to image An image
>> that is clearly visible at a certain window and level when loaded
>> independently is not visible?at all?when I load it as a fusion on
>> another image inspite of setting the window and level correctly and
>> moving the opacity slider to the right extreme.
>>
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Shruti
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> David Sarrut, Phd
> Charg? de recherche CNRS
> Centre de lutte contre le cancer L?on B?rard
> 28 rue La?nnec, 69373 Lyon cedex 08
> Laboratoire CREATIS-LRMN UMR CNRS 5220, Inserm U 630 Tel : 04 78 78 51
> 51 / 06 74 72 05 42 http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/rio
> _________________________________
> ?"2 + 2 = 5,? for extremely large values of 2"
> _________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> vv mailing list
> vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
> http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/vv
>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
vv mailing list
vv at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/vv
End of vv Digest, Vol 7, Issue 4
********************************
More information about the vv
mailing list