[Dcmlib] Group Lenght and '0000'
Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malaterre at kitware.com
Fri Sep 30 20:45:09 CEST 2005
Hello,
I cam across this image recently
http://nova.nlm.nih.gov/WRAMC/DICOM/WRAMC%20VC-443/225017318462C331%20F2EA3F46FAE7321B/99B7F85B3D1343698B6D301746477DEF/2F612AF2451EEDF03AC73C7D19AF8033/FFBE146B651B2A44C6ADC12DB614E3ED.dcm
from http://nova.nlm.nih.gov/wramc/data_index.html
And I get (does not look like 'UL'):
V 130d|0000 [UL]
[Group Length] [1099164365\1276292990\3804772504\555532589] x(4183eacd)
V 140d|0000 [UL]
[Group Length] [835531882\1219434392\151033222\3313626383] x(31cd346a)
V 150d|0000 [UL]
[Group Length] [4259307444\1128414896\4113509537\2144277863] x(7fffffff)
V 160d|0000 [UL]
[Group Length] [3824301659\1114577058\3573223579\2679727550] x(7fffffff)
B 160d|0001 [ ]
[gdcm::Unknown] [gdcm::Binary data loaded;length = 36]
V 170d|0000 [UL]
[Group Length] [3850819895\1116855751\1080659125\3543366330] x(7fffffff)
Since I am responsible for the '0000' => group length, I would like to
remove it. Hopefully nowbody is actually using it. There should not be
any problem since the instances are still available in the dictionary.
Anybody was using this 'feature'
Mathieu
Ps: I'll do that ~tomorrow when my brain is up and running.
More information about the Dcmlib
mailing list