<div dir="ltr"><div>If you're using Cuda, you'll probably need itkCudaComon-5.4.dll too. But in general, I think it's easier and safer to manage all this with CMake following the <a href="https://github.com/RTKConsortium/RTK/tree/master/examples/FirstReconstruction/">FirstReconstruction example</a>.</div><div>Simon<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:34 AM Vincent Libertiaux <<a href="mailto:vl@xris.eu">vl@xris.eu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div>
    <p>Yes, I have the same. What puzzled me is that I already had the
      itkRTK-5.2 on top of the all the others.</p>
    <p>If you can confirm this is the only one I need to link against in
      my GUI, I am all good !</p>
    <p>Thank you again,</p>
    <p>V.<br>
    </p>
    <div>On 07.12.23 11:27, Simon Rit wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">Ok. On my Windows box which compiles RTK nightly
        with Ninja and MSVC 2019, the libs are in the bin folder and
        called itkRTK-5.4.dll and bin/itkCudaCommon-5.4.dll. Maybe the
        itk prefix is new?<br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at
          11:23 AM Vincent Libertiaux <<a href="mailto:vl@xris.eu" target="_blank">vl@xris.eu</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <p>Hi Simon,</p>
            <p>I tried on Windows 10 and 11, with Visual Studio 2019.</p>
            <p>I compile ITK and RTK jointly, with the cuda option on. 
              I tried building both static and dynamic libraries and
              just static ones, the result is the same.</p>
            <p>I have no warning in CMAKE or in Visual Studio.</p>
            <p>Thank you for your time,</p>
            <p>V.<br>
            </p>
            <div>On 07.12.23 11:13, Simon Rit wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div>Hi,</div>
                <div>I'm not sure, I guess there is if you see a
                  difference! Can you tell us more about the operating
                  system and the compiler? Do you compile ITK first and
                  then RTK or both jointly?</div>
                <div>Simon <br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at
                  11:02 AM Vincent Libertiaux <<a href="mailto:vl@xris.eu" target="_blank">vl@xris.eu</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello !<br>
                  <br>
                  I have built a GUI around RTK with ITK 5.2 module and
                  everything works <br>
                  fine.<br>
                  <br>
                  I wanted to upgrade to ITK 5.3 ( I also tried with ITK
                  5.4 with the same <br>
                  results) and for some reasons, not all the rtk*.lib
                  (located in the <br>
                  Build/lib folder) are generated.  I only have 3 of
                  them with the 5.3 and <br>
                  0 with the 5.4.  All my CMake options were the same
                  than for the <br>
                  compilation of version 5.2, namely building shared and
                  static libraries.<br>
                  <br>
                  The applications (rtkfdk, rtkprojections,...) work
                  fine.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  I looked into the CMakeLists files but couldn't really
                  find any useful <br>
                  information.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Is there any significant difference in the *lib
                  generation after ITK v <br>
                  5.2 ??<br>
                  <br>
                  I thank you in advance for any help you can provide !<br>
                  <br>
                  Best regards,<br>
                  <br>
                  Vincent<br>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  Rtk-users mailing list<br>
                  <a href="mailto:rtk-users@openrtk.org" target="_blank">rtk-users@openrtk.org</a><br>
                  <a href="https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users</a><br>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Rtk-users mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:rtk-users@openrtk.org" target="_blank">rtk-users@openrtk.org</a><br>
          <a href="https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Rtk-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rtk-users@openrtk.org" target="_blank">rtk-users@openrtk.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div>